skip header and navigation
COGME- Council of Graduate Medical Education home page


Publications
Reports
Resource Papers

Meetings

News & Events

About COGME

Members & Staff

Useful Links

Site Index

Home

Table 4 - Description of Adjustment Methodology
The authors derive the adjustment to the 1995 per capita physician standard in the following manner:

LET: x(i) = estimated 1995 IRM-adjusted per capita physician requirement standard for scenario (i):

Req = per capita physician requirement standard for 1995.

P(2005)(0) = The IRM projected 2005 percentage change in the requirement for the status quo (scenario i):

P(2005)(i) = The IRM projected 2005 percentage change in the per capita requirement for the scenario (i):

Apply the following formula:
(((P(2005)(i)/100)(Req)) - (((P2005)(0)/100)(Req)+1(Req)) = x(i).
The percentage change is divided by 100 to convert the value to decimal equivalent.

To Illustrate:
In the case of scenario 3, the percentage adjustment produced by the IRM was P(2005)(3) = 12.1%; for scenario 1, it was P(2005)(1) = 10.4%. The 1995 expert average requirement standard for Metro-core was Req = 72.

Substituting:
((((12.1/100)(72) - (10.4/100)(72) + 1(72))) = (.121(72) - .104(72) + 1(72)) =
(.121-.104 + 1)72 = (1.017)72 = 73.1, the 1995 requirement standard of 72 adjusted for changes that are due only to scenario 3.

 

 

 

Back to Resource Paper


 

| Publications | Meetings | News & Events | About COGME | Members & Staff | Useful Links | Site Index | Home |


Last Updated December 6, 2001

Contact Comments@hrsa.gov with site problems or comments.

Bureau of Health Professions
Health Resources & Services Administration
U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Services
U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services home page